A federal judge blocked California’s “assault weapons” ban Thursday, writing that the law is “extreme” and has “no historical pedigree.”
U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez, a George W. Bush appointee, struck down the 1989 ban, enacted by the California legislature in response to the Stockton school shooting, which prohibits the transfer, manufacturing and possession of certain semiautomatic weapons. Benitez wrote that American tradition “is rich and deep in protecting a citizen’s enduring right to keep and bear common arms like rifles, shotguns, and pistols” and does not include firearm restrictions based on “looks or attributes.”
The rifles prohibited under the ban are “virtually the same” as other ones legal in the state, except for their looks, Benitez said.
“This case is about California laws that, in contrast to these constitutional principles, make it a crime to acquire and possess many common modern semiautomatic firearms,” the judge wrote. “Modern semiautomatic rifles like the AR-15 platform rifle are widely owned by law-abiding citizens across the nation. Other than their looks (the State calls them ‘features’ or ‘accessories’) these prohibited rifles are virtually the same as other lawfully possessed rifles.”
LEGAL ALERT: A federal judge has just struck down California’s “assault weapon” ban and stayed the decision for 10 days so the state has time to appeal. Stay tuned for more info and read the opinion here: https://t.co/UonezvsaeG pic.twitter.com/UDmMN7lYiD
— Firearms Policy Coalition (@gunpolicy) October 19, 2023
The same judge issued an injunction against a California gun law banning magazines holding more than 10 rounds in September, finding it unconstitutional based on “the text, history, and tradition of the Second Amendment.”
Benitez stayed his decision for 10 days to allow Attorney General Rob Bonta time to appeal.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
Republished with permission from Daily Caller News Foundation
A judge that HAS read the constitution…what an oddity….
Biff and Bab will get their underwear in a knot over that decision!! Many judges believe The U.S. Constitution does not apply to Chicago, NYC, or the State of Kalifornica.