Former deputy independent counsel Sol Wisenberg ripped the ruling in former President Donald Trump’s civil fraud case as “extremely dubious” on Friday.
Democratic Attorney General Letitia James of New York filed a lawsuit against Trump in September 2022, alleging he overstated the value of real estate holdings. Judge Arthur Engoron’s ruling ordered Trump to pay more than $350 million and banned him from being an officer or director for any New York company or organization for three years.
“I certainly don’t see how the part of the decision that imposes a $355 million judgment is supported by the evidence, because as the judge points out in the very first paragraph of his opinion, and as you pointed out, there’s no loss from the bank,” Wisenberg told “Ingraham Angle” guest host Jeanine Pirro. “The loans were repaid. Now, certainly you can legally engage in fraud of all kinds each if the victim doesn’t lose money, but to impose a penalty of $355 million and to bar him for three years and his sons for two years seems to me to be completely out of proportion to the actual loss here, which was zilch.”
WATCH:
“I have a question for everybody, which is where were all of these people during the 35 years before Donald Trump became an announced candidate for president?” Wisenberg asked. “Why weren’t these people investigating this alleged fraud? People, if there is fraud going on, the U.S. attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York, the district attorney’s office in Manhattan, it doesn’t seem like they were doing their job at all, it appears there was no effort whatsoever to even look at former President Trump until he became a controversial political figure.”
James promised to investigate Trump’s finances during her 2018 campaign for attorney general.
“It strikes me to be constitutionally extremely dubious to basically impose $355 million judgment in a case where there is no loss,” Wisenberg said. “That is just mind boggling to me. I have never seen a case where that happened.”
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
Republished with permission from Daily Caller News Foundation
This whole case was a sham and a major blot on the politically motivated New York judicial system on full display for all to see. When a judge issues a verdict before a trial even starts, before any evidence is presented, and without allowing a jury to decide on the merits, it smacks of total political corruption engaged in by the judiciary. This is especially where the Attorney General campaigned on a pledge to “get Donald Trump” as her main theme. The fact that she actually got elected based on this says volumes about the fairness Donald Trump will get in any court setting in New York, whether a bench trial or a jury trial. The whole New York system is totally corrupt.