video below
If you thought congressional hearings were boring, think again. Monday’s Capitol Hill budget brawl turned into a full-blown political food fight — complete with shouting, finger-wagging, and one jaw-dropping suggestion that an EPA chief chug weed killer.
Lee Zeldin, the Trump-era EPA administrator and former New York congressman, found himself sparring with Connecticut Democrat Rosa DeLauro — and it didn’t take long for things to go sideways.
DeLauro, the longtime appropriator known for her unmistakable purple mane, kicked things off by torching Zeldin’s budget proposal as something that “reads like a climate change denier’s manifesto.” She demanded he “justify abandoning [the EPA’s] duty to protect Americans” from climate change — a familiar talking point from the left’s well-worn script.
Zeldin wasn’t playing along.
“Following the law,” he fired back coolly. “Section 202 of the Clean Air Act. Where does it say anything about fighting global climate change?”
He pressed DeLauro on her grasp of the legal heavyweights shaping federal policy, asking if she was familiar with the landmark Supreme Court case Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo.
The answer? Not exactly confidence-inspiring.
The congresswoman admitted she wasn’t familiar — then pivoted to accuse Zeldin of pushing a worldview where “climate change does not exist” and is treated as a “hoax.” That’s when the gloves really came off.
“I know you’re upset. You don’t know what Loper Bright is. Do you know what the major policies doctrine is?” Zeldin pressed, adding with a jab, “You’re a member of Congress, you should know.”
That line clearly hit a nerve. “Woah. You know, you’re here because you need money from us,” DeLauro snapped, wagging her finger like a scolding schoolteacher. “So halt for this second and wait for the question and answer the question!”
Zeldin shot back that he had answered — and accused her of liking “the microphone on” more than actually reading federal law. “I don’t have to listen to this BS!” DeLauro exploded.
“BS? You think I made up these cases?” Zeldin replied.
“Yeah, I think you have made up a whole lot,” she shot back. So much for decorum.
But the real jaw-dropper came later, when the temperature had supposedly cooled. As Zeldin began comparing enforcement actions between the Trump and Biden administrations, DeLauro abruptly interjected with a single word: “Glyphosate,” referring to the controversial chemical used in weed killers like Roundup.
Zeldin responded with a straightforward warning: if her cup were filled with glyphosate, she shouldn’t drink it. That’s when DeLauro crossed the line from heated rhetoric into something else entirely.
“Maybe you should try doing that,” she said. Yes — a sitting member of Congress essentially told a cabinet official to drink poison. Zeldin didn’t let it slide.
After the hearing, he torched the exchange, writing that “nothing infuriates an uninformed Congressional Dem more than when they realize they voluntarily triggered a debate with someone who actually knows what they are talking about, reads federal statute and adheres to Supreme Court precedent.”
He called DeLauro’s performance a “self-implosion” and added: “When you don’t have anything good to say, some advise to just not say anything at all.”
Then came the final zinger: “Apparently [she] believes that when you don’t have anything good to say, you should instruct the person you are debating to kill themself.”
When you don’t have anything good to say, some advise to just not say anything at all. As for @rosadelauro, she apparently believes that when you don’t have anything good to say, you should instruct the person you are debating to kill themself. https://t.co/E5bwHhfSxt pic.twitter.com/AW9rFP0Fzc
— Lee Zeldin (@epaleezeldin) April 28, 2026
