The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!
The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!

Get my Daily BS twice-a-day news stack directly to your email.


Days after assassination attempt, MSNOW hosts equate Trump’s ICE facilities to ‘concentration camps’

by

During a breezy on-air handoff with Rachel Maddow, O’Donnell casually tossed out a comparison that would make any serious historian cringe. Discussing proposed immigration detention facilities tied to Donald Trump’s policies, O’Donnell wondered aloud whether any of these so-called “Trump prison camp warehouses” had actually opened. Not content to stop there, he went further—lumping the facilities into the same category as “concentration camps,” invoking imagery tied to the Third Reich’s systematic extermination of millions.

Maddow, for her part, eagerly played along, claiming that none of the planned facilities had come online. She pointed to a halted project in Maryland, crediting local activists and a state lawsuit for derailing it. According to her, grassroots resistance—complete with drone surveillance, public records digging, and organized opposition—forced officials’ hands and created a legal blueprint to block similar projects nationwide.

But the segment didn’t stop at victory laps for activists. The pair seemed almost baffled that Republican officials in various states weren’t rolling out the red carpet for these detention centers. Maddow asserted that even minimal GOP resistance caused the Department of Homeland Security to “instantly collapse,” while O’Donnell marveled that Trump voters weren’t demanding these facilities in their communities.

“And there’s been no uprising… saying, ‘Oh no, no, we want Donald Trump’s detention centers and concentration camps here?’” O’Donnell asked, as if the comparison itself were perfectly reasonable. It wasn’t.

Equating U.S. immigration enforcement—however controversial—to the industrial-scale genocide carried out by Nazi Germany trivializes real historical horrors while poisoning any chance at serious debate. Even critics of immigration policy should be able to draw that line.

And the timing? Particularly tone-deaf. Just two days earlier, a disturbing incident tied to the White House Correspondents’ Dinner rattled Washington. A would-be attacker reportedly outlined plans targeting “administration officials,” showing a willingness to harm law enforcement and bystanders if necessary. Against that backdrop, casually dialing up the rhetoric to eleven isn’t just irresponsible—it’s reckless.