The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!
The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!

Get my Daily BS twice-a-day news stack directly to your email.


Judge torches Trump DOJ over ‘massive breach’”

by

If you’re looking for a clean villain-and-hero script, this courtroom brawl isn’t it. What unfolded in a Rhode Island federal court reads less like a tidy political talking point and more like a bureaucratic mess with real-world consequences — and a judge who wasn’t having any of it.

U.S. District Judge Melissa DuBose lit into the Trump-era Justice Department and Homeland Security brass, accusing them of blowing a hole in the court’s trust — her words: a “massive breach.”

At the center of the chaos? A Dominican national, Bryan Rafael Gomez, and a piece of information that somehow got lost in the federal shuffle — an alleged murder warrant from the Dominican Republic. That little detail might have been useful before a judge signed off on release, right?

Instead, the court didn’t get the memo.

After the release, Homeland Security publicly torched the judge, branding her an “activist” and claiming she let a “violent criminal illegal alien” walk free.

A DOJ lawyer, Kevin Bolan, effectively waved the white flag in a written apology that read like damage control under pressure. He admitted he knew about the warrant but said ICE told him he couldn’t disclose it — and that he believed there was a legitimate law enforcement reason to keep it under wraps. Turns out, that information had already been disclosed elsewhere, making the silence in court even harder to explain.

“I sincerely apologize to Judge DuBose, personally, and to the entire Court for the consequences of this lack of disclosure,” Bolan wrote, plainly trying to dodge a contempt citation that’s now very much on the table.

Judge DuBose wasn’t impressed.

“The April 30th, completely erroneous and dangerous press release is still on their website,” she said from the bench. “It puts people at risk. It’s a threat to judicial security… As long as this particular post is out there, it’s setting up a false narrative.”

She went further, cutting to the core of the issue: “there was a decision made not to be truthful to the court,” adding that the episode represented “a massive breach of this court’s trust.”

Even the defense side was blindsided. Gomez’s attorney, Melanie Shapiro, said she was “completely shocked” by the existence of the warrant and “deeply disturbed” by the rhetoric aimed at the judge. She made it clear that if she’d known about the allegation, the case would’ve played out very differently.

Now the spotlight shifts to what comes next. Judge DuBose is weighing whether to slap the government with contempt — a rare but serious rebuke that would signal this wasn’t just a paperwork snafu but a fundamental violation of the court’s trust.