The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!
The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!

Get my Daily BS twice-a-day news stack directly to your email.


Bill Gates tells Congress he hung out with Epstein because the predator was blackmailing him

by

Bill Gates spent years insisting his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was little more than a misguided detour. Now, under congressional scrutiny, the Microsoft co-founder is painting an even uglier picture: one in which the disgraced sex offender allegedly tried to use Gates’ own marital indiscretions as leverage.

Appearing before the House Oversight Committee, the billionaire philanthropist acknowledged that Epstein had learned about his extramarital affairs and attempted to exploit that information after their association soured. “I learned Epstein had become aware of sensitive information about my personal life, including the fact that I had been unfaithful in my marriage. These affairs had nothing to do with my interactions with Epstein, but they were painful for my family,” Gates said in prepared testimony.

That admission marks another chapter in the long-running saga of Gates’ baffling decision to cozy up to one of America’s most notorious sex offenders years after Epstein’s criminal conviction was already public knowledge.

According to Gates, Epstein dangled promises of helping secure billions of dollars for global health and philanthropic projects when the two became acquainted in 2011. There was just one glaring problem: Epstein was already a registered sex offender. “I recall being aware that Epstein had faced prior legal issues, but I did not fully understand the extent of the crimes he committed. I accepted the introduction without applying the scrutiny I should have,” Gates told lawmakers.

That explanation may satisfy loyal defenders of the billionaire, but it is unlikely to silence critics who have spent years asking why one of the world’s most powerful businessmen needed anything from Epstein in the first place.

Gates testified that his interactions with Epstein were limited and ended in 2014. Yet he now claims the financier continued trying to pull him back into his orbit using knowledge of his affairs, along with what Gates described as fabricated claims.

“He was unsuccessful in this effort, but it shows some of the ways he tried to leverage his interactions with me to further his agenda. I should never have met with Epstein in the first place,” Gates said. That final line may be the least controversial statement uttered during the hearing.

Among the most explosive allegations circulating in the document trove is an email attributed to Epstein claiming Gates intended to secretly give then-wife Melinda Gates medication for a sexually transmitted disease allegedly contracted from “Russian girls.” Gates has flatly denied the claim and dismissed the email as fraudulent.

The files also reportedly contain photographs showing Gates with young women, adding fresh fuel to a controversy that has stubbornly refused to fade.

Meanwhile, the personal fallout has already been enormous. Gates’ 27-year marriage to Melinda French Gates collapsed in 2021, and Epstein’s shadow loomed heavily over the split. After the divorce, Melinda offered a brutally clear assessment of the convicted predator. “He was abhorrent. He was evil personified. My heart breaks for these women.”

Despite years of apologies and damage control, Gates continues to insist he witnessed no criminal activity and was never involved in Epstein’s crimes. He has repeatedly emphasized that he never visited Epstein’s private island and has denied meeting any of the women associated with the financier’s abuse network.

“Every minute I spent with him, I regret, and I apologize that I did that… It’s factually true that I was only at dinners. I never went to (his) island, I never met any women,” Gates said in a previous television interview.

Still, the optics remain brutal. Critics note that Gates reportedly continued interacting with Epstein even after Melinda expressed concerns about the relationship. That decision now looks less like a lapse in judgment and more like a case study in elite arrogance—the belief that wealth, influence and good intentions somehow exempt powerful people from basic common sense.

The House Oversight Committee’s broader investigation into Epstein and longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell continues to probe what influential figures knew, when they knew it, and whether key details were hidden from public view.