The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!
The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!

Get my Daily BS twice-a-day news stack directly to your email.


NBC apologizes for biology after Supreme Court Title IX ruling

by

NBC’s Title IX disclaimer may have said more than the Supreme Court ruling itself.

The Supreme Court’s landmark decision upholding state laws that restrict girls’ and women’s sports to biological females was expected to ignite fierce political debate.

What many Americans probably didn’t expect was to see a national news network effectively issue a disclaimer before repeating the language used by the Supreme Court itself.

In a ruling involving challenges to laws in Idaho and West Virginia, the Court determined that states may separate athletic competition on the basis of biological sex without violating Title IX or the Equal Protection Clause. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the majority, emphasized the longstanding role of sex-based classifications in athletics and the state’s interest in protecting competitive fairness for female athletes.

The decision was immediately praised by advocates for women’s sports, including former NCAA swimmer Paula Scanlan and other athletes who have argued that biological differences matter in competition. Supporters called the ruling a major victory for Title IX and for the female athletes the law was originally designed to protect.

But while the legal battle may have reached a milestone, another battle quickly erupted in the media.

During NBC’s coverage of the decision, a reporter paused to tell viewers:

“Just a quick note here. The terms that we’re using here during our reporting, biological male, biological female, the high court put those terms in quotations in their decision and their dissent. But just so you know, we’re using those terms from the decision itself, biological male, biological female.”

The unusual disclaimer drew immediate criticism from legal analyst Jonathan Turley, who argued that the reaction itself demonstrated how detached many news organizations have become from ordinary Americans.

Turley highlighted language from Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion addressing the growing reluctance among activists and institutions to acknowledge biological distinctions between men and women. The professor suggested that the Court’s language was rooted in straightforward biological reality rather than political ideology.

The NBC moment may ultimately become one of the most memorable images from the controversy. Not because of what the Supreme Court said. But because a major news organization felt compelled to warn viewers before repeating it.

Think about where we are as a country.

The Supreme Court issues a decision about biological males competing in women’s sports, and a national news network’s first instinct is to reassure viewers that it doesn’t necessarily endorse the scary words it is about to read aloud from the opinion.

Journalists spent the last decade transforming themselves from reporters into ideological hall monitors. Every story must be filtered through activist sensitivities. Every fact requires a disclaimer. Every biological reality must be wrapped in enough caveats to survive a graduate seminar in gender studies.

And then they wonder why Americans stopped listening. Jonathan Turley put his finger on the larger problem. Many in the press are no longer covering the culture war. They’re participants in it.

Imagine Walter Cronkite interrupting a broadcast to explain that he was only using certain words because the Supreme Court forced him to.

The Court ruled that sex matters in sports. Most Americans nodded and went on with their day because they already knew that. The media, meanwhile, reacted as though someone had uncovered a lost chapter of forbidden literature.

At some point the press is going to have to decide whether its job is to report reality or provide emotional aftercare for activists upset by reality.Until then, every one of these awkward disclaimers will continue accomplishing the exact opposite of what they’re intended to do.

They don’t build trust. They advertise bias.

DAILY BS SOURCES:

today’s hot news