The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!
The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!

Get my Daily BS twice-a-day news stack directly to your email.


Missouri v. Biden: AG sues Biden regime for colluding with Big Tech to muzzle Americans – and WINS!

by

Well, would you look at that — the Show-Me State just showed Washington the door.

After years of trench warfare in the courts, Missouri’s top lawman says he’s landed a haymaker against what critics have long blasted as a cozy, backroom alliance between federal bureaucrats and Big Tech giants. The charge? Turning social media platforms into a digital thought patrol — and slapping the “misinformation” label on anything that didn’t toe the official line.

The lawsuit, Missouri v. Biden, took aim at what it described as a full-court press to muzzle Americans on everything from COVID debates to the Hunter Biden laptop saga, from border chaos to election concerns. In plain English: if you didn’t agree, you risked getting buried, booted, or banned.

According to Missouri officials, that era just hit a brick wall.

After years of legal wrangling, the state says it forced a 10-year, court-enforceable consent decree that puts federal agencies on a tight leash. The ruling reportedly ties the hands of heavy hitters like the Surgeon General, the CDC, and CISA — making it crystal clear: no more arm-twisting, no more backdoor pressure campaigns, and no more “suggestions” that mysteriously lead to posts disappearing.

Translation? Uncle Sam doesn’t get to play editor-in-chief of your social media feed anymore.

The decree allegedly bars federal officials from threatening tech companies with legal, regulatory, or financial consequences just to get content scrubbed. It also shuts the door on any attempts to secretly steer or veto platform decisions — whether that means outright bans, shadow bans, or those ever-mysterious algorithm tweaks that make posts vanish into the digital abyss.

Missouri is taking a victory lap — and not quietly.

State officials are calling it the first real check on what they see as a runaway federal censorship apparatus. The message: slapping a “government-approved” label on speech doesn’t magically erase First Amendment protections. And hiding behind Silicon Valley doesn’t make it constitutional.

This wasn’t just a courtroom win — it was a cultural one. For Americans who felt like they were shouting into the void while bureaucrats and tech execs decided what counted as “truth,” this ruling is being framed as a long-overdue course correction. A reminder that free speech doesn’t come with a federal permission slip — and doesn’t expire when the topic gets uncomfortable.

 

 

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *