At a White House briefing this week, Fox News correspondent Peter Doocy put a question on the table that plenty of Americans are already asking: why are U.S. scientists with access to sensitive nuclear and aerospace programs turning up dead—or simply disappearing?
“There are now 10 American scientists who have either gone missing or died since mid-2024,” Doocy said, cutting through the usual Beltway chatter. “They all reportedly had access to classified nuclear or aerospace material. Is anybody investigating this to see if these things are connected?”
It’s the kind of question that, in a serious government, would trigger urgency. Instead, the answer sounded like a rain check.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt admitted she’d seen the reports—but hadn’t actually checked with anyone who might know.
“I’ve seen the report, Peter,” she said. “I haven’t spoken to our relevant agencies about it. I will certainly do that and we’ll get you an answer. If true, of course, that’s definitely something I think this government and administration would deem worth looking into.”
Meanwhile, outside the briefing room bubble, the story is picking up steam—especially among Americans worried about national security lapses or, depending on your level of skepticism, something even stranger. Reports have been circulating across outlets ranging from the UK’s tabloid press to independent blogs, with claims that as many as ten scientists tied to high-level research have died or vanished under murky circumstances.
Even more mainstream coverage has started to take notice. Newsweek recently highlighted the case of Michael David Hicks, a longtime researcher at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory who worked on asteroid and comet missions. Hicks died in 2023—but notably, no public cause of death was ever disclosed.
That case marked the ninth in what’s become an eyebrow-raising pattern involving experts in space, defense, and nuclear fields.
To be clear, officials insist there’s no proven link tying these cases together. No smoking gun. No official claims of foul play. Just a string of high-level scientists—gone. Still, the coincidences are starting to pile up.
According to the same reporting, lawmakers have begun quietly pushing for more scrutiny as incidents stack up—from the disappearance of a retired Air Force general to the killing of a prominent astrophysicist. None definitively connected, but collectively hard to ignore.
And that’s where the frustration kicks in. The federal government needs more time when top minds tied to classified work start dropping off the radar?
Maybe there’s a perfectly boring explanation. Maybe every one of these cases is unrelated. But when you’re talking about individuals with access to some of the nation’s most sensitive secrets, “probably nothing” doesn’t exactly inspire confidence.













Logically speaking there are several possibilities:
1) there is some grand plot by foreign actors trying to either disrupt our nuclear programs/cutting edge science projects. (most likely), or
2) The “woo-woo” factor of every conspiracy theory, or
3) Just a major coincidence that sooo many science tech types are be targeted by “random” acts of violence that is predicated upon them simply disappearing vs. other “random” acts that ended in death. (Very unlikely and coincidences at this level are incredibly rare.)
This is unlikely as it draws attention and can not be dismissed as mere coincidence when you consider the statistics of how many other people just disappear and it turns out to be innocent acts of death or not, but are not in the “woo-woo” camp. ie just random acts of violence or simple unexplained death.
This leaves us with the inescapable conclusion that since they are not being found, these scientists are being abducted and taken to some other place for their knowledge. Otherwise why not make it look accidental and have their bodies found? ie if the goal was to simply deny us their talent, an accident with a present/found body would avoid all the extra attention. They are wanted for some future development of knowledge by actors or groups who need/want that knowledge.