The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!
The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!

Get my Daily BS twice-a-day news stack directly to your email.


‘No one’s begging!’ Marco Rubio torches Cory Booker in heated exchange over Iran war

by

Marco Rubio wasn’t about to let Sen. Cory Booker get away with rewriting reality.

During a fiery Capitol Hill showdown over State Department spending, the secretary of state swatted down Booker’s claim that President Donald Trump is somehow crawling back to Iran hat-in-hand after years of confrontation with the regime.

Booker launched into a familiar progressive lament, declaring that the conflict with Iran “should have never happened” and insisting America had somehow strengthened its adversary. Then came the line that lit the fuse.

“We’re in a stalemate with Iran,” Booker complained. “And now we’re begging to get back into a deal that you all trashed in the first place.”

Rubio’s response was immediate. “There’s no begging… no one’s begging for anything here,” Rubio shot back. “The Iranians might be begging because they’re losing hundreds of millions of dollars per day.”

That exchange captured the broader divide in Washington. One side sees a weakened Iranian regime battered by economic pressure, domestic unrest and military setbacks. The other seems determined to portray every challenge facing Tehran as evidence of American weakness.

Rubio made clear which side he believes the facts support. “Understand, Iran had street protests going on before all of this started. All of those economic factors in Iran are far worse today than they were 6 months ago today when those protests were happening,” he said.

The secretary then delivered a grim assessment of conditions inside the Islamic Republic. “They have hyperinflation, their currency is completely devalued, they’re struggling to make payroll for their government workers. Iran is in a very serious situation.”

Rubio went even further, arguing that many figures inside Iran’s political establishment would gladly cut a deal if they had the final say. “If it was up to the political class there — and I understand everybody there is sort of radical in some way — but if it was up to the people that actually like go to elections and wear the suits and that you see on TV, they would probably make a deal tomorrow.”

According to Rubio, the real obstacle remains Iran’s unelected power structure. “The issue they’re facing is the supreme leader and the IRGC are a little more immune to those pressures, until they can be convinced otherwise. And I think that’s the direction they’re moving in.”

Then came the question hanging over Booker’s argument: How exactly is Iran stronger? Rubio sounded genuinely baffled. “I don’t where you’re getting this perception that Iran is stronger. Iran has no navy less, they’ve lost a substantial percentage of their defense-industrial base, Iran has lost a substantial percentage of their missile launchers, and their economy is far worse — and I mean far worse — than it was 6-9 months ago.”

In other words, the regime has suffered military losses, economic pain and mounting internal pressure. Yet somehow, in the telling of Trump’s critics, Tehran is the side sitting pretty.

Booker wasn’t convinced. The New Jersey Democrat pivoted to complaints about Trump’s public optimism regarding negotiations and continued warning that the situation remained unresolved.

“The war’s over now,” Rubio said.

“The war is not over,” Booker fired back. “The American people see how we’re losing at the pump and with their costs, and yet this thing still has not been resolved.”

That response highlighted another familiar Washington habit: when the facts become inconvenient, change the subject.

For years, foreign-policy insiders insisted maximum pressure would never force Iran into a corner. Yet Iran continues to face economic strain, political dissatisfaction and growing challenges to its regional ambitions. Whether negotiations ultimately succeed or fail, the claim that America is “begging” while Iran sits in a position of strength requires ignoring an awful lot of evidence.

Rubio clearly wasn’t interested in playing along.

And for a few memorable moments on Capitol Hill, Booker’s narrative ran headfirst into reality.