The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!
The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!

Get my Daily BS twice-a-day news stack directly to your email.


Daughters of the American Revolution leadership votes to allow transvestites, tells DAR members to get over it

by

 

There are few institutions in America that carry the weight of history quite like the Daughters of the American Revolution.

Founded in 1890, the organization built its identity around preserving the memory of the American Revolution, honoring ancestors who contributed to the nation’s founding, and maintaining a tradition of female membership.

Now, that tradition is at the center of a very modern American argument.

A dispute has erupted within the DAR after members challenged a decision by national leadership regarding transgender membership. The controversy intensified after leadership urged members to accept the change and move forward, a message critics interpreted as dismissive toward longtime members who believe the organization’s historic mission is tied specifically to women’s heritage.

And that’s where the fireworks started.

Because nothing says “quiet historical society meeting” quite like a full-blown cultural earthquake. Conservative commentator Mollie Hemingway weighed in, arguing that the core question was not simply about politics but about the purpose and definition of the organization itself.

The argument from critics is straightforward: if a group’s founding purpose was built around women’s lineage and women’s civic participation, changing the definition of membership represents a major philosophical shift — not just an administrative adjustment.

Supporters of the policy change argue the opposite: that historic organizations survive by adapting, and that inclusion allows them to remain relevant in a changing society.

This is the kind of debate America has become very familiar with.

A decades-old membership organization can become a national headline overnight because every institution is now viewed through the lens of America’s larger cultural divide.

The question facing the DAR — and countless groups like it — is not just who belongs.

It is whether an organization can redefine itself without alienating the very people who built it.

For members who see the DAR as a living connection to the nation’s founding story, this feels like a fight over preservation.

It’s still going strong. Just now with more press releases and fewer quiet tea meetings.

today’s hot news