The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!
The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!

Get my Daily BS twice-a-day news stack directly to your email.


Texas court orders lifesaving care for Baby Gabriel after surrogate mom refuses demand to abort

by

Baby Gabriel will receive lifesaving medical care when he is born in Texas—whether his intended parents consent to it or not.

A Dallas County associate judge issued an emergency temporary restraining order Tuesday requiring doctors to provide medically indicated stabilizing and life-sustaining treatment to the unborn child, who has been diagnosed with a severe congenital heart defect.

The order came less than 24 hours after Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton intervened on behalf of McKenna West, an Alaska nurse and gestational surrogate who refused the intended parents’ alleged demand that she abort the child.

“Upon the child’s live birth, medically indicated stabilizing and life-sustaining care shall be provided to the child pending further order of this Court,” the order states.

It continues:

“No person shall withhold, direct the withholding of, obstruct, or delay that care.”

The court also prohibited anyone from removing Gabriel from his hospital, transferring him to another facility or taking him out of Texas while the legal battle continues.

The next court hearing is scheduled for August 25. West is expected to deliver Gabriel in early September.

It is a major—but still temporary—victory for a woman who decided that a surrogacy contract did not require her to participate in ending the life of the baby growing inside her.

West, a single mother of two, entered into a surrogacy arrangement through Connecticut-based Worldwide Surrogacy Specialists. The intended parents, California residents Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed, are identified in court filings as the child’s genetic parents.

At approximately 20 weeks, doctors discovered that Gabriel had hypoplastic left heart syndrome, or HLHS, a critical defect in which the left side of the heart does not develop properly.

West described the moment to Live Action News:

“The doctor came in and told us there was something really wrong with the baby’s heart. There was no blood flow through the left side of the heart.”

The diagnosis is extremely serious, but it is not automatically hopeless. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says babies born with HLHS require surgery soon after birth.

Treatment generally involves three operations: the Norwood procedure during the first days of life, the Glenn procedure several months later and the Fontan procedure during early childhood.

According to NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, children receiving surgical treatment have a 72% survival rate to age five. Among those reaching five, approximately 90% survive to adulthood.

Those are not guarantees. The surgeries are complex, the risks are real and children with HLHS may face continuing medical difficulties.

But they are chances—and West believed Gabriel deserved one.

According to Paxton’s office and West’s court filings, the intended parents requested an abortion after receiving the diagnosis. They have not publicly responded to the latest allegations through their attorneys.

West refused.

She wrote in court documents that the proposed late-term procedure was morally unacceptable to her:

“How could I possibly live with myself going through that?”

West researched specialists and arranged to deliver in Dallas, where doctors experienced in treating the condition would be available. She reportedly offered to reduce the intended parents’ costs by staying with a friend and later offered to assume responsibility for Gabriel herself.

Her brother also offered to adopt the child. The intended parents did not accept those proposals, according to West’s legal filings.

The intended parents have pursued a case in California seeking recognition of their parental rights and asking that West deliver the baby in that state.

West filed her own case in Alaska seeking custody so she could authorize Gabriel’s treatment. The dispute then moved to Texas, where West sought protection against Gabriel being removed before doctors could operate.

Paxton intervened Monday, arguing that the unresolved parentage battle does not erase a physician’s independent obligation under Texas law to stabilize and treat a critically ill newborn.

“Baby Gabriel deserves a chance at life, and I will not allow anyone to unlawfully deny him medically necessary care,” Paxton said.

His office also sent letters to UT Southwestern Medical Center and Children’s Medical Center Dallas reminding the hospitals that emergency treatment may be provided without parental consent or a separate court order.

Paxton sought to draw a clear line between the two legal questions: A court may still have to decide who speaks for Gabriel as his parent, but no party should be permitted to deny him emergency care while that question remains unsettled.

The judge agreed—at least for now.

The order requires the hospital and doctors to notify the court immediately following Gabriel’s birth and initial medical assessment. They must also report any refusal to approve medically indicated treatment or any attempt to discharge, transfer or transport him.

If someone refuses consent, the court will hold an emergency hearing to determine whether intervention is required.

Paxton celebrated the ruling:

“The court has made the right decision in immediately acting to protect baby Gabriel’s life and ensure he receives the care he deserves.”

He added:

“My office utilized every tool at our disposal to protect life, and we will not back down in continuing to support baby Gabriel’s well-being. Every child in our state deserves to be cared for and protected.”

The ruling includes a painful complication for West.

Although it protects her authority over her own health and pregnancy before delivery, the temporary order prevents her from making medical decisions for Gabriel after birth. The intended parents retain decision-making authority, subject to the court’s requirement that necessary treatment cannot be obstructed. The order also reportedly prohibits West from having contact with Gabriel following his birth.

Live Action founder Lila Rose, who has assisted West, called that provision “deeply unjust.”

“Baby Gabriel will be separated from the only mother he’s known, left to go through surgery without her comfort or support.”

Rose continued:

“Baby Gabriel is not a product. He is a human being. His needs should be the top priority. The fight must continue for Baby Gabriel.”

That is the heartbreaking contradiction at the center of this case.

West carried Gabriel, refused to have him aborted, traveled across the country to locate treatment and entered a legal battle to protect his life. Yet when he arrives and faces major heart surgery, she may be ordered to disappear from his bedside.

Surrogacy law is tangled because it attempts to assign contractual rights in an intensely human situation that refuses to behave like a business transaction. Adults sign papers. A child then enters the equation with medical needs and interests of his own.

Gabriel did not sign the contract. He did not select his diagnosis. And he is not a defective product to be returned because the future may be difficult.

The court has not resolved the final parentage dispute, nor has it awarded West custody. It has done something more immediate: It has made sure Gabriel will not be denied a chance to live while the adults continue fighting over who has the right to decide his future.

For now, that chance is the victory.

WIRE SOURCES

today’s hot news