Hey folks—I know not everyone gets a chance to catch Rush Hour live, so I’m going to start including a link to each episode right here in the blast. That way, if you missed the show or just want to hear it again, it’s only a click away – or check out my thoughts below.

VIEW HERE: 

Look out for the Rush Hour link Tuesday – Saturday in your Daily BS email blast.

Democrats had plenty to say about migrants—until a Jewish woman asked about Jews

There are moments in politics when a party reveals more about itself through what it refuses to discuss than through everything printed in its platform.

Thursday’s Rush Hour contained one of those moments.

At a New York political event featuring House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries, Attorney General Letitia James and other prominent Democrats, Stephanie Benchimol stood up and asked a straightforward question.

The speakers had discussed Haitians and migrants. Benchimol wanted to know what they planned to do about antisemitism and the safety of Jewish New Yorkers.

“You mentioned the Haitian community and the migrants, but what about the Jewish community?” she asked. “Can I ask you, please, what will you do to help us combat antisemitism?”

It was not an ambush. It was not an insult. It was exactly the sort of question elected officials should expect at something resembling a public meeting.

Instead of an answer, she was talked over.

As the room turned hostile, someone could be heard yelling, “Shut up about the Jews.” Benchimol persisted, noting that she is the granddaughter of Holocaust survivors and asking why nobody would address her concern. She invoked the history of Jewish Americans who stood beside Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. during the civil-rights movement.

Then she was told to leave.

“I’ll leave, but don’t touch me,” she said as she was escorted out.

The elected officials remained. The question remained unanswered.

That short exchange captured the modern Democratic Party’s moral hierarchy with uncomfortable clarity.

If someone asks about illegal immigrants, Democratic politicians have prepared remarks, sympathetic anecdotes and new government programs. If a Jewish woman asks about antisemitism in New York, the audience tells her to shut up while the leaders onstage move along.

Benchimol was historically correct. Jewish Americans played an indispensable role in the civil-rights movement. Some placed their bodies and lives on the line to help black Americans secure rights the Democratic machines of the South had spent generations denying them.

Today, in a heavily Democratic room in New York, a Jewish woman invoking that shared history was treated as an interruption.

That is not merely rude. It is a warning.

Jewish voters are being shown where they now rank inside the progressive coalition. Their concerns matter when useful for a speech about diversity. When those concerns collide with the coalition’s preferred candidates, activists or anti-Israel politics, they are suddenly inconvenient.

The message becomes: Sit down, stop asking questions and remember to vote Democrat.

How many times can people be told to shut up, get out and go home before they finally believe the people saying it?

The same refusal to confront reality is now creating trouble for Democrats in Michigan.

A new Fox News poll shows Republican Mike Rogers leading Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed 51% to 47%. The advantage is within the margin of error, so nobody should begin measuring the curtains. But the details should have Democrats reaching for the antacid.

Rogers has greater unity among Republicans, while El-Sayed is struggling with Democrats who do not identify with the Democratic Socialists of America. Rogers also holds a narrow advantage among independents.

CNN’s Harry Enten put the result in historical perspective. He said he could not find another Michigan Senate poll meeting CNN’s publication standards this century in which a Democratic candidate trailed by at least four points. El-Sayed, he noted, is “breaking records in the ways that you don’t want to.”

This is Michigan—not Texas—and a Republican is leading.

More than half of voters surveyed, 54%, said El-Sayed’s positions are too extreme. Among non-DSA Democrats and independents, his support fell to 69%, compared with near-unanimous backing from DSA supporters.

That is the problem Democrats were warned about during the primary. El-Sayed may excite socialists, activists and the college-educated Left, but winning a statewide general election requires voters outside the socialist clubhouse.

His answer to that challenge appears to be a Medicare-for-All plan that he acknowledges will require taxes. El-Sayed argues that everybody should “pay a bit in” so everyone feels invested in the system.

There it is.

The promised free healthcare has arrived with a tiny footnote: Everybody pays.

Socialists are wonderfully generous with benefits and remarkably coy about the invoice.

El-Sayed also faces renewed scrutiny over conditions at Detroit Animal Care and Control during his tenure as the city’s health director. A  2015 whistleblower lawsuit alleged animals were kept in filthy conditions and denied adequate food and medical attention, sometimes becoming ill or dying. El-Sayed later acknowledged that he had inherited a mess and said the department needed leadership that would do right by the animals and the people of Detroit.

Republicans are predictably using the episode against him. Rogers offered a brutal summary: El-Sayed wants Michigan families to trust him, while Detroit residents supposedly could not trust his administration with their pets.

That line is going to leave a mark.

Americans will argue about taxes, immigration and foreign policy all day. But mistreated dogs and cats? That cuts across party lines.

Even Michael LaRosa, a former Biden White House press secretary, reacted to the allegations by saying he “really, really” did not want to believe them and asked whether they could be verified.

That is not the response a Senate candidate wants from a fellow Democrat.

And yet, El-Sayed remains only four points behind. Michigan is closely divided, Democrats are highly energized, and the race could shift many times before Election Day. But that is exactly why every weakness matters. Rogers does not have to turn Michigan into a red state. He only needs enough moderate Democrats and independents to conclude that El-Sayed is too much.

New York offered another example of Democrats blaming everyone except the people who have held power.

A young progressive posted a breathless complaint that the average studio apartment in New York City costs more than $4,000 a month. Fair complaint. Housing costs are obscene.

Then came the explanation: “MAGA Republican policies and private equity” had supposedly seized New York housing in a chokehold.

Which MAGA Republicans?

New York City has been governed by Democratic machine politics since approximately the invention of indoor plumbing. Yes, voters occasionally called in a Republican mayor to clean up the mess. Then, once the streets were safer and the books were steadier, Democrats returned to resume the experiment.

The housing shortage, rent regulations, zoning restrictions, taxes, bureaucracy and building obstacles did not arrive on a red hat from Florida. They were created, expanded or preserved by the political class that has controlled New York for generations.

Blaming MAGA for Manhattan rent is like blaming the visiting team because your stadium ran out of hot dogs.

The woman did ask one useful question: How are ordinary New Yorkers affording these rents?

That deserves a serious answer. But the answer will never be found while the people running the city blame a political movement that barely has enough New York City officeholders to fill a taxicab.

This is the connecting thread: avoidance.

Ask Democratic leaders about antisemitism, and the questioner gets removed.

Ask why El-Sayed cannot unite Michigan Democrats, and the answer becomes Donald Trump.

Ask who made New York unaffordable after generations of Democratic rule, and somehow MAGA sneaks into the landlord’s office.

There is always somebody else to blame and some other subject to discuss.

We play the exchanges the networks condense, follow the political arguments to their logical conclusions and occasionally pause to determine whether SoHo is below NoHo or NoHo is above SoHo.

For the record, SoHo is south of Houston Street. NoHo is north of it. New York rents remain too damn high on both sides.

You can hear the full exchanges—and the parts that only work when you hear them—by listening to Bo Snerdley’s Rush Hour here.

Rush Hour airs Monday through Friday and moves quickly through the day’s hottest political stories, breaking developments and media absurdities. It is the fastest hour in American media because there is always more happening than the legacy media has time—or desire—to explain.

And if you want my daily stack of news and commentary delivered directly to you, sign up for The Daily BS here. It is free, arrives daily and, unlike a New York Democratic event, questions are not removed for exceeding ideological capacity.