The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!
The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!

Get my Daily BS twice-a-day news stack directly to your email.


Hollywood splits over Mark Ruffalo as 180 Jewish entertainers and creatives defend him

by

BS BULLETIN:

  • More than 180 Jewish artists, writers and academics signed an open letter defending Mark Ruffalo against accusations that his criticism of Paramount’s owners was antisemitic.
  • The letter comes after nearly 1,000 Jewish entertainment figures and allies condemned Ruffalo for invoking Israel, Jewish billionaires and media control while attacking the proposed Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery merger.
  • The dueling letters feature prominent Jewish voices on both sides of an increasingly bitter Hollywood fight over Israel, antisemitism and corporate power.

More than 180 Jewish entertainers, writers and academics have rallied behind Mark Ruffalo after the actor was accused of using antisemitic tropes in his attacks on Paramount and its proposed Warner Bros. Discovery merger.

The new open letter, titled “Enough!” described the criticism of Ruffalo as an “outrageous smear campaign.”

Signers include filmmaker Joel Coen, playwright Tony Kushner, actors Wallace Shawn, Ilana Glazer and Debra Winger, director Todd Haynes, comedian Sarah Sherman and author Naomi Klein.

The controversy began after Ruffalo condemned the proposed $111 billion merger between Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery.

Ruffalo focused his attack on Paramount CEO David Ellison and his father, Oracle founder Larry Ellison, accusing the family of “powering some of the most destructive and inhuman forces in the world.”

He connected Oracle’s business relationship with the Israeli military to the war in Gaza and warned that the merger would place enormous media and technology power in the Ellisons’ hands.

Paramount accused Ruffalo of invoking antisemitic stereotypes about wealthy Jewish executives secretly controlling media, technology and world events.

“Invoking the centuries-old trope of Jews and money — particularly in response to a business dispute — is not only inaccurate, it is antisemitic,” the company said.

The Anti-Defamation League, Simon Wiesenthal Center and Creative Community for Peace also condemned Ruffalo’s remarks.

Nearly 1,000 Jewish entertainment professionals, community members and allies subsequently signed a letter arguing that Ruffalo had crossed the line from criticizing a corporate merger into antisemitism.

“This is not commentary on a merger,” that letter stated. “It is not a criticism of a government. This is simple antisemitism, where Jewish executives are portrayed as a secretive and powerful wealth-hoarding elite delighting in mass death.”

The Auschwitz Jewish Center Foundation also backed Paramount and praised the company for confronting Ruffalo’s language.

The new letter defending Ruffalo rejects that characterization.

“Enough with the false and dangerous weaponization of charges of antisemitism against those who are brave enough to point out the obvious,” the signers wrote.

They argued that Ruffalo was criticizing corporate power, surveillance technology and the Ellison family’s support for Israel—not targeting the executives because they are Jewish.

“Pointing out the crucial connections between what is happening in Gaza and what is happening in Hollywood is the exact opposite of antisemitism,” the letter stated. “It is, for us, the very essence of Jewish ethical duty.”

Ruffalo has denied harboring hostility toward Jewish people and called the accusations against him “appalling.”

The two letters leave Hollywood’s Jewish community publicly divided over whether Ruffalo engaged in legitimate political criticism or repackaged an old antisemitic narrative in the language of media consolidation and artificial intelligence.

MY QUICK TAKE

When a Hollywood controversy produces dueling open letters with more than 1,000 combined signatures, you know the original argument has left the building.

But this fight exposes something worth remembering: Neither side gets to settle the question by counting Jewish names at the bottom of a letter. Jewish Americans are not a political hive mind, and 180 signatures do not automatically cancel 1,000—or vice versa.

The substance matters.

Ruffalo is entitled to criticize Israel, Oracle, Paramount or any merger he wants. But when the argument starts combining Jewish billionaires, media control, secret technology and mass suffering, he should not act stunned when people hear echoes of some very old and ugly accusations.

Hollywood loves a sequel. This one could have used a script doctor.


DBS WIRE SOURCES:

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *