MAGA activist warns Trump’s AI sprint needs guardrails — ‘I am a mom with common sense’

BS BULLETIN:

Tea Party veteran and Trump ally Amy Kremer is pushing Congress to impose tougher AI safety requirements even as the administration races China for technological dominance.
Kremer says AI companies should face mandatory reporting requirements when their technology is tied to serious incidents involving children, violence or other harms.
She insists the argument is not about slowing America down: “I want America to win this AI race.”

One of the grassroots conservatives who helped build the Tea Party and later became a fierce Trump ally is warning Republicans not to confuse winning the artificial-intelligence race with letting Big Tech write its own rules.

Amy Kremer, an RNC member and chairwoman of Humans First, is calling for federal guardrails on artificial intelligence as President Donald Trump pushes to keep the United States ahead of China. Her argument is aimed squarely at conservatives.

“I want America to win this AI race, I absolutely do,” Kremer told Fox News Digital. “I’m America first, always have been.”

But she says winning does not require Washington to ignore potential dangers involving children, jobs and national security.

“You don’t have to forego safety to have innovation and ingenuity,” she said.

Kremer’s organization is pressing for more accountability from AI companies, including reporting requirements when their systems are implicated in serious incidents. She compared the industry to airlines and hospitals, which face mandatory reporting and regulatory requirements when something goes badly wrong.

Kremer pointed specifically to cases involving young people and chatbots. She cited the 2025 Florida State University mass shooting, where court filings allege the accused gunman used ChatGPT while planning aspects of the attack. The wife of one victim later sued OpenAI, and Florida opened a criminal investigation into the company.

Kremer argues that episodes like that expose a regulatory gap.

“If a chatbot is used in planning a school shooting,” she said, AI companies currently are not required to report that fact to the federal government.

She also raised concerns about cases in which chatbots have allegedly manipulated or encouraged vulnerable young users toward self-harm. Her position puts her in an unusual place in Washington’s rapidly expanding AI debate.

Democrats and several technology executives have called for tighter restrictions or slower development. Trump, meanwhile, has made defeating China in artificial intelligence a national priority and has rejected broad efforts that he says could cripple American innovation. Kremer says she wants neither extreme.

“I’m not siding with the Democrats,” she said. “I’m not anti-AI. I’m not anti-technology. I’m not anti-data center.”

Her explanation was considerably less Washingtonian: “I am a mom with common sense and I’m a conservative.”

The Trump administration itself is not arguing for a completely rule-free AI industry. Its national AI policy framework calls for Congress to require safeguards for platforms likely to be used by minors, including parental controls, age-assurance measures and protections against sexual exploitation and self-harm.

The larger disagreement is over how far those protections should go without slowing American companies enough to give Beijing an opening.

Kremer has also become increasingly critical of the political influence wielded by major technology companies. She argues that companies courting Republicans today should not automatically be treated as ideological allies simply because they want favorable policies from the Trump administration.

“They don’t care about Republicans, they don’t care about Democrats,” Kremer said. “At the end of the day, I think they care about their own companies and their technology.”

That may be the real fight developing on the right. Not whether America should beat China in AI. But how much freedom Silicon Valley gets while doing it.

MY QUICK TAKE

Conservatives have seen this movie before.

For decades, Washington was told that one industry after another was simply too important, too innovative, or too complicated for ordinary people to question.

Wall Street knew best. Social-media companies knew best. Big Pharma knew best. And somehow the experts always seemed to discover that the best policy also happened to be the one their shareholders preferred.

Markets need competition. Freedom needs accountability. And “America must beat China” should not become a magic phrase that ends every other question.

Kremer’s argument is actually pretty old-fashioned conservatism: innovate like crazy, beat the communists and keep government from smothering the industry — but don’t tell American parents they have no business asking what the machine is doing to their kids.

Because if the choice really becomes “China wins” or “your 12-year-old gets beta-tested by Silicon Valley,” somebody has framed the choices incorrectly. And there is nothing anti-technology about asking the people building the most powerful technology in human history to occasionally explain what happens when it goes sideways.

(Video: Fox News Digital)