The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!
The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!

Get my Daily BS twice-a-day news stack directly to your email.


Zelenskyy says allies failed to warn Ukraine of Russian missiles — Trump insists U.S. intelligence is still flowing

by

THE DAILY BS: HOW MUCH CAN YOU HANDLE?

SPARE ME THE BS (I’ve got things to do).

  • Zelenskyy says Ukraine received no advance warning from its international partners before five Russian ballistic missiles struck civilian infrastructure in Kyiv.
  • Trump says the United States is still sharing intelligence, rejecting any suggestion that American assistance has stopped.
  • A senior Ukrainian official described the missing warning as a “failure.” The available reporting does not establish that Washington deliberately withheld information.

LAY IT ON ME (I’ve got time).

Five Russian ballistic missiles struck civilian infrastructure in Kyiv without advance warning from Ukraine’s international intelligence partners, according to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

And now Ukraine is asking a question that goes well beyond the latest Russian barrage: Why didn’t the warning come?

Zelenskyy said Tuesday that the country received no early intelligence alert before the attack. He described the barrage as particularly vile and stressed that timely warnings about ballistic missiles can save lives. Unlike slower-moving threats, ballistic missiles can leave civilians and air-defense crews with only minutes to react.

The Ukrainian president did not publicly identify which partner countries he believed had failed to provide the warning. The United States has intelligence capabilities that can detect Russian missile launches and has previously shared information that helps Ukraine prepare its defenses. Asked about the matter, President Donald Trump insisted that American intelligence cooperation had not stopped. “We are helping them, and we are sharing intel,” Trump told reporters.

The apparent contradiction has an important qualification. A senior Ukrainian official told the Associated Press that the absence of a warning had been described as a “failure.” That explanation leaves open the possibility of a technical or operational breakdown rather than a deliberate decision by Washington to withhold information.

Russia’s attacks continued as Ukraine struggled to protect its cities and energy infrastructure. Zelenskyy said Russian forces had launched more than 100 weapons against Ukrainian targets since Monday evening. In Kharkiv, a Russian attack destroyed part of a residential building, killing four people and injuring dozens more, according to Ukrainian officials.

The intelligence dispute also comes amid disagreement over Trump’s announcement of an energy ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. Trump said the countries had agreed to stop striking each other’s energy facilities. Moscow has not confirmed such an agreement, and Russian attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure have continued.

Zelenskyy says Ukraine has refrained from striking Russian energy facilities since Trump’s announcement, although that claim has not been independently verified. Ukraine also faces shortages of Patriot air-defense interceptors as demand for those weapons increases elsewhere.

That makes early warning information especially valuable.

Trump says the intelligence is still flowing. Zelenskyy says a crucial warning never arrived.

Those statements are not necessarily mutually exclusive. A country can continue sharing intelligence while a particular warning fails.

But for Ukrainians facing incoming missiles, the distinction offers little comfort.

The important question now is what failed — and whether the next warning will arrive before the next attack.


DBS WIRE SOURCES (I’ve got all day).