LISTEN HERE

MY SATURDAY MIX: The charges can disappear. The damage doesn’t.

There’s a photograph of actor Timothy Busfield that ought to make every American think seriously about the power of an accusation.

He’s wearing an orange jail jumpsuit.

Not the Timothy Busfield people remember from thirtysomething, The West Wing, or Field of Dreams. Not the familiar television actor who spent decades working in Hollywood. This is a man in custody, accused of something so terrible that merely hearing the allegation is enough to make people recoil.

And that’s precisely the problem.

Because on Friday, a judge in New Mexico threw out the grand jury indictment against Busfield, citing prosecutorial misconduct and serious errors in the proceedings.

Now I have a question.

Who gives the man his reputation back?

I talked about this on Saturday’s James Golden Show, and I want to be very careful about something. I do not know whether Timothy Busfield is innocent or guilty of the conduct alleged. I wasn’t there. I haven’t examined every piece of evidence. And the judge’s decision was not an acquittal. Prosecutors may still pursue the case.

But one important element of the case, that cannot be overlooked is that the accusations came from one family. Two boys – twins – were working on a show, The Cleaning Lady, that Mr. Busfield was directing. They were “let go,” apparently for performance reasons. It was after this that the allegations of “misappropriate” touching arose.

However, during the initial police interviews the boys denied the incidents had taken place. There are allegations from the defense that the boys were coached to make the allegations with coaching from their parents. Their dismissal from the show, obviously had an impact on the financial expectations of the family.  .

There is something else that we all should keep in mind.

In America, an accusation is not supposed to be a conviction.

And a prosecutor is not supposed to be able to bend the rules because the allegations are especially disturbing.

Again, Busfield has strenuously denied the allegations. His attorneys have challenged the prosecution’s handling of the case and disputed the accusations themselves. And his wife, who presumably knows her husband better than anyone, did not flee his side or cower in shame. She put her own untarnished reputation on the line to vociferously state her husband was totally innocent.

Add this to the mix. An extensive investigation of Mr. Busfield’s past found no other instance – ever – of any allegations of inappropriate behavior with children, throughout his lengthy career as a Hollywood actor and director.

Then came Friday’s ruling.

New Mexico District Judge Joseph Montaño found that the prosecutor had failed to act fairly and impartially during the grand jury proceedings. Jurors had wanted to hear additional witnesses, but the instructions and procedures imposed by the prosecution effectively kept those witnesses from testifying.

Think about that for a moment.

A grand jury is supposed to examine evidence and determine whether there is sufficient cause to bring criminal charges. It is not supposed to be a rubber stamp.

Yet here was a judge concluding that the process had been compromised because the very people entrusted with presenting the case had interfered with the jurors’ ability to hear witnesses they requested.

That is not some harmless paperwork error.

That goes to the heart of whether the system is functioning as it should.

And here’s what troubles me.

When Busfield was arrested, his name was everywhere. His photograph was everywhere. The allegations were everywhere.

You didn’t have to follow the case closely to absorb the message.

Timothy Busfield. Child sex abuse allegations. Orange jumpsuit.

That’s enough to plant an image in people’s minds that may never completely disappear.

I admitted on the air that I hadn’t paid particularly close attention to the case when the original headlines appeared. With everything happening in the world, I saw the photographs and the accusations and had that weary reaction so many people have when another celebrity is accused of something awful.

What did somebody do now?

But that’s exactly why this case deserves a closer look.

We live in an age when accusations travel around the world before the accused person has had an opportunity to respond. The public sees the photograph, reads the headline, and begins forming conclusions.

Then, months later, a judge issues a ruling about misconduct in the prosecution.

How many of the people who saw the original photograph will ever see that ruling?

How many will read beyond the headline?

And how many will spend the rest of their lives vaguely remembering that Timothy Busfield was accused of something terrible, without knowing what happened afterward?

That’s the kind of damage you can’t easily calculate.

His wife, actress Melissa Gilbert, has stood by him publicly. She has described the toll the case has taken on their family. Following Friday’s ruling, she shared a line about a good deed shining in a weary world.

I can understand why the ruling would bring relief to a family that has lived under such an extraordinary cloud.

But relief is not the same thing as getting your life back.

Suppose, for the sake of argument, that Busfield is completely innocent.

How does he reclaim the opportunities that disappeared? How does he erase the suspicion? How does he persuade every person who saw that photograph to look at him the same way they did before?

You can’t put a reputation in a repair shop.

You can’t hand somebody a receipt and tell him his good name will be ready Tuesday.

And while we’re talking about justice, I want to make something else absolutely clear.

Children who report sexual abuse must be taken seriously. Their allegations deserve careful, professional investigation. Genuine victims deserve protection, compassion, and justice.

That obligation does not disappear because an accused person is famous, wealthy, or well-connected.

But neither does the accused person’s right to due process.

These principles are not enemies.

We can protect children without abandoning the presumption of innocence. We can pursue justice without giving prosecutors permission to cut corners.

In fact, we must.

Because when prosecutors mishandle a case, they don’t just jeopardize the rights of the accused. They can also undermine the possibility of a reliable outcome for the people who brought the allegations.

Everybody loses confidence.

And that brings me to another issue raised during Saturday’s program.

A caller from New Jersey reminded me of the Duke lacrosse case, another notorious example in which accusations became national headlines and prosecutorial misconduct became a central part of the story.

The circumstances of these cases are different, and I don’t want to pretend otherwise. But the broader lesson is worth remembering.

A prosecutor’s job is not simply to win.

A prosecutor’s job is to seek justice.

There is an enormous difference.

If the evidence supports criminal charges, pursue them lawfully and vigorously. If witnesses need to be heard, let the process work. If evidence undermines the accusation, it cannot simply be treated as an inconvenience.

And if a prosecutor violates the rules designed to protect the integrity of the system, there should be meaningful accountability.

Not because Timothy Busfield is a television actor.

Not because his wife is Melissa Gilbert.

Not because I have any particular attachment to The West Wing — a program that, as I joked on Saturday, gave liberals a fantasy White House to retreat to during the Bush years.

But seriously, I don’t care whether Busfield is a liberal, a conservative, or completely uninterested in politics.

I care because the principles involved belong to every American.

The presumption of innocence isn’t something we reserve for people we like.

Due process isn’t a courtesy extended to people with good publicists.

And prosecutorial fairness isn’t optional when the accusation is especially ugly.

Those protections matter most when the public is angry, the allegations are horrifying, and the temptation to declare somebody guilty is overwhelming.

I don’t know what happens next in Timothy Busfield’s case. Prosecutors were still considering their options after the judge dismissed the indictment.

If the state brings a new case, it must be allowed to proceed through a lawful process. If the allegations are proved, there should be accountability. If they are not, that matters just as much.

But whatever happens, I hope people remember what Friday’s ruling revealed about the proceedings that produced the original indictment.

Because there is something deeply troubling about a system that can publicly attach a terrible accusation to a person’s name, then discover serious misconduct in the process used to bring that accusation.

The court can dismiss an indictment.

The headlines can be updated.

The lawyers can issue statements.

But the internet remembers. Neighbors remember. Employers remember. Strangers remember.

And sometimes what they remember is only the accusation.

Justice isn’t merely about punishing the guilty. It’s also about protecting the innocent from being punished.

If we lose sight of that distinction, we’re going to have a much bigger problem than one celebrity’s damaged reputation.

We’re going to have a justice system that Americans can no longer trust.

And that ought to worry every one of us.

— Bo

LOOK FOR RUSH HOUR IN THE DAILY BS BLASTS TUESDAY – SAT!

Look out for the Rush Hour link Tuesday – Saturday in your Daily BS email blast.