In a transparent attempt to smear President Donald Trump, the Wall Street Journal published sensational claims regarding a supposed drawing sent to Jeffrey Epstein, prompting the President to vehemently deny the baseless allegations.
The Journal’s report, lacking credible verification, alleged that in 2003, President Trump sent a birthday letter to the late, disgraced sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, supposedly containing a crude drawing of a nude woman, with Trump’s signature bizarrely depicted as pubic hair. This outlandish claim immediately raised eyebrows among those familiar with the relentless attacks on President Trump.
President Trump swiftly and unequivocally dismissed the report as “a fake thing” and “a fake Wall Street Journal story,” stating, “I never wrote a picture in my life. I don’t draw pictures of women.” His firm denial underscores the dubious nature of these allegations. But the rabid ‘get Trump’ crowd was quick to take the first part of the statement and discard the qualifier, “I don’t draw pictures of women.”
Critics and the legacy media were quick to point to other, well-known sketches by President Trump, such as his charitable drawings of the Manhattan skyline from 2004 and 2005, and the Empire State Building from 1995. These innocent, publicly known works, often created for charity auctions, stand in stark contrast to the salacious and unverified “drawing” described by the Journal, which conveniently surfaced just as President Trump’s political momentum continues to surge.
Predictably, political opportunists like California Governor Gavin Newsom seized upon the fabricated narrative, posting a photo of one of Trump’s legitimate drawings on social media with a mocking caption. This desperate attempt to score political points highlights the lengths to which the opposition will go to distract from their own failures and President Trump’s undeniable popularity.
The Wall Street Journal’s sensational description of the alleged 2003 letter to Epstein paints a vivid, yet uncorroborated, picture: “contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker. A pair of small arcs denotes the woman’s breasts, and the future president’s signature is a squiggly ‘Donald’ below her waist, mimicking pubic hair.” Such lurid details, presented without concrete evidence, serve only to fuel the media’s anti-Trump agenda.
In a decisive move to combat this blatant defamation, President Donald Trump announced his intention to sue News Corp and Rupert Murdoch, the owners of the Wall Street Journal in a Truth Social message where he referred to himself in the third person. This legal action sends a clear message:
The Wall Street Journal, and Rupert Murdoch, personally, were warned directly by President Donald J. Trump that the supposed letter they printed by President Trump to Epstein was a FAKE and, if they print it, they will be sued. Mr. Murdoch stated that he would take care of it but, obviously, did not have the power to do so. The Editor of The Wall Street Journal, Emma Tucker, was told directly by Karoline Leavitt, and by President Trump, that the letter was a FAKE, but Emma Tucker didn’t want to hear that. Instead, they are going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story anyway. President Trump will be suing The Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp, and Mr. Murdoch, shortly. The Press has to learn to be truthful, and not rely on sources that probably don’t even exist. President Trump has already beaten George Stephanopoulos/ABC, 60 Minutes/CBS, and others, and looks forward to suing and holding accountable the once great Wall Street Journal. It has truly turned out to be a “Disgusting and Filthy Rag” and, writing defamatory lies like this, shows their desperation to remain relevant. If there were any truth at all on the Epstein Hoax, as it pertains to President Trump, this information would have been revealed by Comey, Brennan, Crooked Hillary, and other Radical Left Lunatics years ago. It certainly would not have sat in a file waiting for “TRUMP” to have won three Elections. This is yet another example of FAKE NEWS!
The desperation of the legacy media is further exposed by figures like MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell, who floated an “insane theory” that Senator JD Vance is somehow attempting to force President Trump out of the presidency over this “Birthday Letter” controversy. O’Donnell’s wild speculation, suggesting Vance could “do more damage to Donald Trump than anything that has ever happened to Donald Trump in his entire political career” by demanding the letter’s release, is a prime example of the deranged narratives pushed by those terrified of President Trump’s return to power. This level of media hysteria is truly “Off. The. Rails.”
