The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!
The Daily BS • Bo Snerdley Cuts Through It!

Get my Daily BS twice-a-day news stack directly to your email.


Nike trips over its own laces in Boston Marathon blunder

by

In the run-up to the iconic Boston Marathon, where more than 32,000 runners grind through 26.2 grueling miles across eight Massachusetts towns, Nike thought it had a cheeky motivational message. Instead, it face-planted.

Inside its swanky Newbury Street store, the sportswear giant plastered a sign that read: “Runners welcome. Walkers tolerated.” Cute? Not exactly. Within hours, the internet lit up like a finish-line clock, with critics accusing the brand of “pace shaming” and, worse, taking a swipe at runners who don’t fit the elite mold.

The backlash was swift—and Nike blinked.

In damage-control mode, the company rushed out a statement: “We want more people to feel welcome in running – no matter their pace, experience or the distance.” Translation: message received, sign removed. The company admitted, “One of them missed the mark. We took it down, and we’ll use this moment to do better and continue showing up for all runners.”

Too late. The outrage had already lapped them.

Among those calling foul was Robyn Michaud, a veteran competitor in the marathon’s adaptive division. She didn’t mince words, posting: “Due to a spinal cord injury, I HAVE to take walk breaks.” Then came the dagger: “Even with a cyst in my spinal cord, I still regularly break 5 hours in Boston and plan to again this weekend. Thank you for TOLERATING me, @Nike.”

She added a pointed suggestion: “Perhaps you should swing by the adaptive and para staging area on Monday to see what true grit is all about.” Mic drop at mile marker one.

Another runner, Nicole Homerin—who’s gearing up for her ninth marathon despite a heart condition—told WGBH the sign completely missed the bigger picture: “It doesn’t even acknowledge all the other ways that we can move our bodies – rolling, strolling, dancing, whatever mobility device that allows for freedom of movement.”

Others piled on, arguing the message reinforced a snobby, top-down view of fitness. Tina Zhu Xi Caruso didn’t hold back: “The running community is just very ableist… like you need to run fast, you need to run hard, you need to have dedication, you need to just do everything that a disabled person might not be able to do, or an older person.”

And then there was the everyday runner—the backbone of races like Boston—who torched the elitism narrative altogether: “No matter the speed, forward is a pace. If you run, you’re a runner. Period.” He added, “I am still a Boston Marathon finisher. I am proud of my 6:01:37 finish… I am not ‘tolerated.’”

Here’s the irony: the Boston Marathon is already one of the toughest races on earth just to qualify for. Men aged 18–34 need a blistering 2:55 finish time; women in the same group must clock 3:25. This isn’t exactly a casual Sunday jog—it’s a proving ground.