x
In suburban Chicago’s Evanston, Illinois, a dramatic confrontation erupted after a serious incident involving a federal law-enforcement vehicle. A sedan rear-ended a federal border-patrol vehicle, drawing a hostile crowd and ending in a violent arrest captured on video.
According to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the sequence of events began when the border-patrol vehicle was being aggressively tail-gated by a red sedan. DHS says the agents attempted a U-turn and the sedan collided with their car. One of the occupants then “physically assaulted” an agent: the man allegedly grabbed the agent’s genitals and “squeezed them”. The agent responded with what DHS described as “defensive strikes.”
A crowd then quickly gathered around the scene and escalated matters. DHS reported that the crowd surrounded the agents’ vehicle, verbally abused them, spat on them and intervened as arrests were made.
Footage from the scene shows a federal border-patrol agent wrestling the suspect to the ground and then repeatedly striking him while bystanders shouted profanity, tried to interfere and one even attempted to pull the agent away. Meanwhile, another officer appears to raise a can of pepper spray to subdue the crowd, and the suspect at one point can be heard saying he “could not breathe.”
The mayor of Evanston, Daniel Biss, responded swiftly. He urged more residents to join the city’s “rapid response” teams organized to monitor federal-agent activity and announced that the city has passed ordinances declaring certain public properties as “No ICE Zones.” In his own words: “It is an outrage… Our message for ICE is simple: Get the hell out of Evanston.”
This incident takes place against the backdrop of increased federal-immigration enforcement operations in the region. In response, members of the community have formed what the media call “rapid response” teams to alert and mobilize neighbors when agents appear.
Our federal law-enforcement agents—men and women putting themselves on the line at the border and now in our cities—were tail-gated, physically assaulted and then confronted by a mob. Yet the focus gets flipped, and suddenly the agents are being condemned while the attackers get a pass. Enough.
This event in Evanston is a microcosm of what’s wrong: agents doing their job, a violent assault, then public-safety breakdown. The mayor of that liberal stronghold responds not with support for law enforcement, but by ripping the feds and sanctifying the “No ICE” zones. He tells federal agents to get out. That is the wrong message.
When an agent has his groin grabbed—a legitimately painful and dangerous assault—and defends himself, we don’t call that brutality: we call that self-defense. The public and media ought to stop tipping hats to crowd intimidation. They are encouraging lawless behavior.
We must ask: who speaks for the federal agents? Who defends public-safety professionals when they are under attack? When cities like Evanston treat the federal presence as adversary rather than partner? The American people deserve better. Agents deserve our respect. Our rule of law deserves our support.
